I repeat, six thousand wage earners.

I collected this proposal.

I accept this proposal.

I thought you were against this proposal.

Therefore, the question is why do we need this proposal?

The ECB welcomes this proposal .

Damascus, however, also brushed off this proposal.

Therefore , the proposal is particularly welcome at this time .

This proposal for a directive is still being considered by the Council.

The EMI welcomes this proposal .

We are overall in agreement with Antoine Waechter's report.

I shall list them here, as we have to draw our own conclusions.

There are two other obvious objections to this proposal.

The ECB agrees with this proposal .

So I said yes to this proposition.

For that reason, my group has voted against the motion and the individual paragraphs contained in it.

4 ) BUDGETARY IMPLICATION 409 The proposal has no implication for the Community budget .

The proposal has no implication for the Community budget .

There are three powerful arguments in favor of this proposal.

Several top economists are coauthors on this proposition.

The majority of the committee said no to the proposal.

We shall try to obtain the Council's agreement for that.

However, we view this proposal with extreme caution.

This proposal is foreseen in the Simplification Rolling Programme for adoption by the Commission in 2009 .

Amendments Nos 1, 4 and 5 deal with reciprocity, seeking a restoration of

The ECB can therefore accept the proposal .

I was pilloried for this proposal when I initially put it forward.

Unfortunately, I am obliged to submit this motion for a resolution to the vote.

That is something we have said in the European Parliament on more than one occasion, though not in this form.

Thus , the draft legislation proposes additional characteristics on environmental expenditure .

I should really like to have an answer on this. Why does it not also include selfemployed women ?

This is why Article 4 of the proposal makes no provision regarding maritime transport and it is also the very simple reason why I cannot agree to Amendment 4.

That is why we need detailed information about the sector as soon as possible.

Again the Commissioner answers without any hesitation that we must do so.

There that is my formal proposal.

Let me refer briefly to two of these aspects.

asks the European Parliament to reiterate its support for this proposal.

This burden of proof should be countered by the requirement that the party causing the damage provide information and allow his documents to be inspected.

This proposal is consistent with the existing financial programming of the Commission .

This is my submission for the L.A. Museum of Film.

I would also add that the sharpened competition in Europe is one of the reasons for the increase of this kind of employment contract.

But I shall be voting against this proposal and wanted to say so here.

( 2 ) The ECB assumes that this provision will be amended if the Commission has not published its proposal before the entry into force of the proposed directive .

The European Parliament welcomed this Commission proposal at first reading on 19 May.

I must say that the implementation of programmes under VALOREN has been disappointing and we are considering at the moment how we might improve the situation.