This assumption is not correct .

But this assumption was mistaken.

It is founded on supposition.

That was only a guess.

That seems to be a reasonable assumption.

The facts don't correspond with your assumption.

This, because they disobeyed and were ever trespassing.

That is because they disobeyed and have been trespassing.

That was because they disobeyed and used to transgress the bounds (in their disobedience to Allah, i.e. commit crimes and sins).

This is because they disobeyed (Allah) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allah's disobedience, crimes and sins).

That was because they disobeyed and transgressed.

That is because they rebelled and committed aggression.

That was for their disobedience and transgression.

That is because they were rebellious and used to transgress.

That, because they would disobey and commit transgressions.

That, because they would disobey and commit transgression.

That was because they disobeyed and were habitually transgressing.

That is because they disobeyed and habitually transgressed.

It is all because of their transgression and rebellion.

This resulted from their disobedience and their habit of transgression.

This because they rebelled and went on transgressing.

And the assumption is is that they're related like cousins or whatever.

Let them swear by Allah (saying) We affirm that our testimony is truer than that of both of them, and that we have not trespassed (the truth), for then indeed we should be of the wrong doers.

We do not transgress in the matter lest we become unjust ones.

And we have not been guilty of any misstatement for then indeed we would be transgressors.

It is time to act, Yahweh, for they break your law.

It is time for thee, LORD, to work for they have made void thy law.

Every spirit makes its house, and we can give a shrewd guess from the house to the inhabitant.

So what is the intuitive, but incorrect assumption, that's kept us from understanding brains?

We made a guess. The guess was that schools in remote areas do not have good enough teachers.

Wherefore for their breach of their bond We accursed them and We made their hearts hard.

So because of their breach of their covenant, We cursed them, and made their hearts grow hard.

Because of their breaking their pledge, We cursed them, and made their hearts hard.

Then, for their breach of the covenant We cast them away from Our mercy and caused their hearts to harden.

And because of their breaking their covenant, We have cursed them and made hard their hearts.

But because they broke their covenant, We cursed them and hardened their hearts.

So for their breaking of the covenant We cursed them and made their hearts hard.

For their disregard of their solemn covenant with God, We condemned the Israelites and made their hearts hard as stone.

Since they broke their solemn pledge, We laid on them Our curse and hardened their hearts.

We have violated yet another taboo in our own lives, and this is a bonus taboo.

These objectives are not negotiable, as has been spelt out first by the Security Council and then, last Sunday, by Presidents Bush and Gorbachev.

So shortly after the war, this young man, Yutaka Taniyama, developed this amazing conjecture called the Taniyama Shimura Conjecture.

We accompanied Joshua, as he walked the Earth, visiting villages where he had once killed and raped.

However , this assumption is not always correct , as all types of payment instrument can be used for such transactions .

You know, let's just make an educated guess, and they simply point and they go for 10 percent, right in the middle.